Resumen
In this report, the Grand Jury details their investigation into the telecommunications services provided and the management of telecommunications by county and municipal agencies.
It was issued on June 13, 2019.
Responses from agencies are available below.
View the document
This document may not work with all assistive technology and is being remediated. For alternative formats, please email Heather Callan or phone 415-473-6132. To use the California relay service, dial 711.
Responses
| Responding agency | Status |
|---|---|
| Marin County Board of Supervisors | Responded September 10, 2019 |
| Marin Telecommunications Agency Board of Directors | Responded September 6, 2019 |
| Belvedere City Council | Responded August 13, 2019 |
| Corte Madera Town Council | Responded September 20, 2019 |
| Fairfax Town Council | Responded September 5, 2019 |
| Mill Valley City Council | Responded September 16, 2019 |
| Ross Town Council | Responded September 19, 2019 |
| San Anselmo City Council | Responded June 13, 2019 |
| San Rafael City Council | Responded September 13, 2019 |
| Sausalito City Council | Responded September 11, 2019 |
| Tiburon Town Council | Responded September 4, 2019 |
| CIO, County of Marin | Invited to Respond August 6, 2019 |
| General Manager, Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit | Invited to Respond August 6, 2019 |
Privacy
Reports issued by the Civil Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code Section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person, or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Civil Grand Jury.
The California State Legislature has stated that it intends the provisions of Penal Code Section 929 prohibiting disclosure of witness identities to encourage full candor in testimony in Civil Grand Jury investigations by protecting the privacy and confidentiality of those who participate.