Pasar al contenido principal

Follow-Up Report on Web Transparency of Agency Compensation Practices

Document last updated on Friday, January 19, 2024.

Resumen

This Grand Jury report makes specific recommendations for every agency to follow to ensure compliance with legal requirements and to go beyond compliance to achieve higher standards of public transparency.

It was issued on April 28, 2020. Responses due July 27, 2020.

Responses from agencies are available below.

View the document

This document may not work with all assistive technology and is being remediated. For alternative formats, please email Heather Callan or phone 415-473-6132. To use the California relay service, dial 711.

Responses

Report Responses
Responding agency  Status
Almonte Sanitary District Responded September 29, 2020
Alto Sanitary District Responded July 22, 2020
Bel Marin Keys Community Services District  Responded August 21, 2020
Belvedere-Tiburon Joint Recreation Committee District Responded August 12, 2020
Belvedere-Tiburon Library Agency Responded September 21, 2020
Bolinas Community Public Utility District Responded July 22, 2020
Bolinas Fire Protection District Responded July 23, 2020
Central Marin Fire Authority Responded September 16, 2020
Central Marin Police Authority Responded May 14, 2020
Central Marin Sanitation Agency Responded May 14, 2020
City of Belvedere Responded June 8, 2020
City of Larkspur Responded July 1, 2020
City of Mill Valley Responded July 7, 2020
City of Novato Responded July 16, 2020
City of San Rafael Responded June 1, 2020
City of Sausalito Responded July 11, 2020
County of Marin Responded July 14, 2020
Firehouse Community Park Agency No response
Homestead Valley Sanitary District Responded May 22, 2020
Inverness Public Utility District Responded May 27, 2020
Kentfield Fire Protection District Responded June 10, 2020
Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District Responded June 22, 2020
Marin City Community Services District Responded September 3, 2020
Marin Clean Energy (MCE) Responded July 22, 2020
Marin County Resource Conservation District Responded August 12, 2020
Marin County Transit District Responded June 1, 2020
Marin General Services Authority Responded September 11, 2020
Marin Healthcare District Responded August 26, 2020
Marin Municipal Water District Responded July 21, 2020
Marin/Sonoma Mosquito and Vector Control District Responded June 30, 2020
Marinwood Community Services District Responded July 23, 2020
Muir Beach Community Services District Responded April 28, 2020
North Marin Water District Responded July 10, 2020
Novato Fire Protection District Responded June 4, 2020
Novato Sanitary District Responded June 9, 2020
Richardson Bay Sanitary District Responded June 19, 2020
Ross Valley Fire Department Responded October 14, 2020
Ross Valley Sanitary District (Sanitary District No. 1) Responded May 26, 2020
Sanitary District No. 5 Belvedere Tiburon Responded May 21, 2020
Sausalito - Marin City Sanitary District Responded July 14, 2020
Sleepy Hollow Fire Protection District Responded August 28, 2020
Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District Responded August 7, 2020
Southern Marin Fire Protection District Responded June 1, 2020
Stinson Beach County Water District Responded July 15, 2020
Stinson Beach Fire Protection District Responded August 7, 2020
Tamalpais Community Services District Responded May 13, 2020
Tiburon Fire Protection District Responded July 9, 2020
Tomales Village Community Services District Responded November 13, 2020
Town of Corte Madera Responded August 18, 2020
Town of Fairfax Responded July 8, 2020
Town of Ross Responded July 10, 2020
Town of San Anselmo Responded June 23, 2020
Town of Tiburon Responded August 19, 2020
Transportation Authority of Marin Responded June 26, 2020

Privacy

Reports issued by the Civil Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code Section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person, or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Civil Grand Jury.  

The California State Legislature has stated that it intends the provisions of Penal Code Section 929 prohibiting disclosure of witness identities to encourage full candor in testimony in Civil Grand Jury investigations by protecting the privacy and confidentiality of those who participate. 

Related

Page last updated on Abril 11, 2025.