Resumen
The Grand Jury investigation focused exclusively on evacuation as it relates to planning, funding, and implementing public works projects on our roads.
This report was issued on December 14, 2020.
Responses from agencies are available below.
View the document
This document may not work with all assistive technology and is being remediated. For alternative formats, please email Heather Callan or phone 415-473-6132. To use the California relay service, dial 711.
Responses
| Responding agency | Status |
|---|---|
| County of Marin[PDF] | Responded March 9, 2021 |
| City of Belvedere[PDF] | Responded March 8, 2021 |
| City of Larkspur[PDF] | Responded March 3, 2021 |
| City of Mill Valley[PDF] | Responded March 2, 2021 |
| City of Novato[PDF] | Responded March 10, 2021 |
| City of San Rafael[PDF] | Responded February 17, 2021 |
| City of Sausalito | No Response |
| Town of Corte Madera[PDF] | Responded March 2, 2021 |
| Town of Fairfax[PDF] | Responded March 3, 2021 |
| Town of Ross[PDF] | Responded March, 2021 |
| Town of San Anselmo[PDF] | Responded February 23, 2021 |
| Town of Tiburon[PDF] | Responded March 17, 2021 |
| Transportation Authority of Marin[PDF] | Responded February 26, 2021 |
| Marin Wildfire Prevention Authority[PDF] | Responded February 22, 2021 |
Privacy
Reports issued by the Civil Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code Section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person, or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Civil Grand Jury.
The California State Legislature has stated that it intends the provisions of Penal Code Section 929 prohibiting disclosure of witness identities to encourage full candor in testimony in Civil Grand Jury investigations by protecting the privacy and confidentiality of those who participate.